<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrew Hyde - Latest Comments in Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhyde.disqus.com/</link><description>Andrew Hyde is a minimalist and vagabond. </description><atom:link href="https://andrewhyde.disqus.com/simple_permalink_trick/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:59:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You guys did better than CNBC, you made the _National_ Nightly news. I posted a link on my blog, &lt;a href="http://mattbrowne.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="mattbrowne.com"&gt;mattbrowne.com&lt;/a&gt;. Great work!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Browne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:59:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew, I just started my personal blog and am learning about Wordpress through a lot of trial and error. After publishing my second post, I saw the ugly permalink (?p=6) and immediately remembered this post you wrote. You helped me out and in the process, I learned how to rewrite some .htaccess files. While I'm not exactly sure what that means, I did it and now have beautiful permalinks. Thanks dude!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tarable</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:37:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just noticed that just using /%postname%/ actually breaks the WordPress in_category() function. However, if I use their pre-set date-based structure, it works fine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Menzie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:28:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Chris yes, the date can be very helpful&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if it helps or hurts you?  Does it cloud the URL or does it provide relevant data?    Would a google search of 2008 simple permalink trick not work for my current structure, but work really well with yours?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:23:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I like to see the date and name based structure. I helps when I'm scrolling through search results in Google and want to get information that's up to date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Older posts can make good reference material, but I've been burned more than once following something from an article I later find out was dated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just an extra nicety for the end-user, but either way works just so long as there's no ugly question mark in the url.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:29:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was too simple. Thanks for the tip! I've been wondering about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Menzie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:36:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@sacker yes, the date is a good option as well, for me it is not the most useful thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Permalink Trick</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/simple-permalink-trick/#comment-3600094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any reason not to use the second option, 'Date and name based'?  Does this hurt SEO in any way?  I appreciate being able to put a post into context by having the date embedded in the URL as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sacker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:10:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>